Process for removing contaminants in a compressor

ABSTRACT

A process for preventing contaminants from forming in a compressor in a methanol to olefin separation system comprising: compressing an effluent in the compressor, the compressor having an inlet in fluid communication with a suction line, an outlet, and an inner compressor surface; and injecting a contaminant prevention medium into the suction line of the compressor wherein any contaminants are removed from the compressor with the effluent and optionally separated or otherwise removed from the effluent stream in downstream equipment.

PRIORITY CLAIM

The present application claims the benefit of European Patent Application Serial No. 13191187.7 filed Oct. 31, 2013, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

The invention relates to a process for removing contaminants that form in the compressor associated with an oxygenate to olefin separation system.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Oxygenate-to-olefin processes are well described in the art. Typically, oxygenate-to-olefin processes are used to produce predominantly ethylene and propylene. An example of such an oxygenate-to-olefin process is described in US Patent Application Publication No. 2011112344, which is herein incorporated by reference. The publication describes a process for the preparation of an olefin product comprising ethylene and/or propylene, comprising a step of converting an oxygenate feedstock in an oxygenate-to-olefins conversion system, comprising a reaction zone in which an oxygenate feedstock is contacted with an oxygenate conversion catalyst under oxygenate conversion conditions, to obtain a conversion effluent comprising ethylene and/or propylene.

U.S. Pat. No. 7,007,701 describes a process for removing contaminants from a compressor in a methanol to olefin separation system. The process comprises compressing an effluent in a compressor such that a contaminant forms on the compressor surface and then injecting a contaminant removal medium directly into the compressor to contact the contaminant and remove it from the compressor. In one embodiment, the contaminant removal medium is injected directly into one or more stages of a compressor body. The patent describes a preferred embodiment of drilling holes into the outer wall of the compressor adjacent to a compressor stage and inserting one or more atomizing nozzles or other injection devices into the hole. Alternatively, the contaminant removal medium can be injected directly into the compressor inlet.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides a process for preventing contaminants from forming in a compressor in a methanol to olefin separation system comprising: compressing an effluent in the compressor, the compressor having an inlet in fluid communication with a suction line, an outlet, and an inner compressor surface; and injecting a contaminant prevention medium into the suction line of the compressor wherein any contaminant-forming components are removed from the compressor with the effluent and optionally separated or otherwise removed from the effluent stream in downstream equipment.

The invention further provides a process for removing contaminants from a compressor in a methanol to olefin separation system comprising: compressing an effluent in the compressor, the compressor having an inlet in fluid communication with a suction line, an outlet, and an inner compressor surface, the compressing occurring under conditions effective to form a contaminant on the inner compressor surface; injecting a contaminant removal medium into the suction line of the compressor; contacting the contaminant removal medium with the contaminant under conditions effective to remove the contaminant from the inner compressor surface thereby forming a mobile contaminant; and removing the mobile contaminant from the compressor.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

The invention provides a process for preventing contaminants from forming and/or a process for removing contaminants that have formed in a compressor associated with an oxygenate to olefins separation system. By preventing and/or removing these contaminants the efficiency and run length of the compressors is increased. The prior art describes a process for injecting a contaminant removal medium directly into the compressor, preferably at multiple points throughout each stage of the compressor. This invention provides for injection of a contaminant removal medium and/or a contaminant prevention medium into the suction line of the compressor. By injecting the contaminant removal and/or a contaminant prevention medium in the suction line, the formation of contaminants can be prevented and/or be removed without having to install nozzles in the compressor body. Further, having only a single injection point for each compressor suction line instead of a plurality of injection points in the compressor casing reduces the maintenance effort required and at the same time reduces the risk of effluent leakage to atmosphere. Since the contaminant removal and/or a contaminant prevention medium is injected into the suction line some distance before the gas enters the compressor, the contaminant removal and/or a contaminant prevention medium has time to be evenly distributed throughout the gas thus providing for more effective protection against contaminant formation and fouling of the compressor. Further, due to the even distribution, the protective measures are effective against contaminant formation on all surfaces in the compressor and not just those surfaces where the contaminant removal medium is injected. The process and embodiments of the invention will be described in further detail.

The oxygenate to olefins process receives as a feedstock a stream comprising one or more oxygenates. An oxygenate is an organic compound that contains at least one oxygen atom. The oxygenate is preferably one or more alcohols, preferably aliphatic alcohols where the aliphatic moiety has from 1 to 20 carbon atoms, preferably from 1 to 10 carbon atoms, more preferably from 1 to 5 carbon atoms and most preferably from 1 to 4 carbon atoms. The alcohols that can be used as a feed to this process include lower straight and branched chain aliphatic alcohols. In addition, ethers and other oxygen containing organic molecules can be used. Suitable examples of oxygenates include methanol, ethanol, n-propanol, isopropanol, methyl ethyl ether, dimethyl ether, diethyl ether, di-isopropyl ether, formaldehyde, dimethyl carbonate, dimethyl ketone, acetic acid and mixtures thereof. In a preferred embodiment, the feedstock comprises one or more of methanol, ethanol, dimethyl ether, diethyl ether or a combination thereof, more preferably methanol or dimethyl ether and most preferably methanol.

In one embodiment, the oxygenate is obtained as a reaction product of synthesis gas. Synthesis gas can, for example, be generated from fossil fuels, such as from natural gas or oil, or from the gasification of coal. In another embodiment, the oxygenate is obtained from biomaterials, such as through fermentation.

The oxygenate feedstock can be obtained from a pre-reactor, which converts methanol at least partially into dimethylether and water. Water may be removed, by e.g., distillation. In this way, less water is present in the process of converting oxygenates to olefins, which has advantages for the process design and lowers the severity of hydrothermal conditions to which the catalyst is exposed.

The oxygenate to olefins process, may in certain embodiments, also receive an olefin co-feed. This co-feed may comprise olefins having carbon numbers of from 1 to 8, preferably from 3 to 6 and more preferably 4 or 5. Examples of suitable olefin co-feeds include butene, pentene and hexene.

Preferably, the oxygenate feed comprises one or more oxygenates and olefins, more preferably oxygenates and olefins in an oxygenate:olefin molar ratio in the range of from 1000:1 to 1:1, preferably 100:1 to 1:1. More preferably, in a oxygenate:olefin molar ratio in the range of from 20:1 to 1:1, more preferably in the range of 18:1 to 1:1, still more preferably in the range of 15:1 to 1:1, even still more preferably in the range of 14:1 to 1:1. It is preferred to convert a C4 olefin, recycled from the oxygenate to olefins conversion reaction together with an oxygenate, to obtain a high yield of ethylene and propylene, therefore preferably at least one mole of oxygenate is provided for every mole of C4 olefin.

The olefin co-feed may also comprise paraffins. These paraffins may serve as diluents or in some cases they may participate in one or more of the reactions taking place in the presence of the catalyst. The paraffins may include alkanes having carbon numbers from 1 to 10, preferably from 3 to 6 and more preferably 4 or 5. The paraffins may be recycled from separation steps occurring downstream of the oxygenate to olefins conversion step.

The oxygenate to olefins process, may in certain embodiments, also receive a diluent co-feed to reduce the concentration of the oxygenates in the feed and suppress side reactions that lead primarily to high molecular weight products. The diluent should generally be non-reactive to the oxygenate feedstock or to the catalyst. Possible diluents include helium, argon, nitrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, methane, water and mixtures thereof. The more preferred diluents are water and nitrogen with the most preferred being water.

The diluent may be used in either liquid or vapor form. The diluent may be added to the feedstock before or at the time of entering the reactor or added separately to the reactor or added with the catalyst. In one embodiment, the diluents is added in an amount in the range of from 1 to 90 mole percent, more preferably from 1 to 80 mole percent, more preferably from 5 to 50 mole percent, most preferably from 5 to 40 mole percent.

During the conversion of the oxygenates in the oxygenate to olefins conversion reactor, steam is produced as a by-product, which serves as an in-situ produced diluent. Typically, additional steam is added as diluent. The amount of additional diluent that needs to be added depends on the in-situ water make, which in turn depends on the composition of the oxygenate feed. Where the diluent provided to the reactor is water or steam, the molar ratio of oxygenate to diluent is between 10:1 and 1:20.

The oxygenate feed is contacted with the catalyst at a temperature in the range of from 200 to 1000° C., preferably of from 300 to 800° C., more preferably of from 350 to 700° C., even more preferably of from 450 to 650° C. The feed may be contacted with the catalyst at a temperature in the range of from 530 to 620° C., or preferably of from 580 to 610° C. The feed may be contacted with the catalyst at a pressure in the range of from 0.1 kPa (1 mbar) to 5 MPa (50 bar), preferably of from 100 kPa (1 bar) to 1.5 MPa (15 bar), more preferably of from 100 kPa (1 bar) to 300 kPa (3 bar). Reference herein to pressures is to absolute pressures.

A wide range of WHSV for the feedstock may be used. WHSV is defined as the mass of the feed (excluding diluents) per hour per mass of catalyst. The WHSV should preferably be in the range of from 1 hr⁻¹ to 5000 hr⁻¹.

The process takes place in a reactor and the catalyst may be present in the form of a fixed bed, a moving bed, a fluidized bed, a dense fluidized bed, a fast or turbulent fluidized bed, a circulating fluidized bed. In addition, riser reactors, hybrid reactors or other reactor types known to those skilled in the art may be used. In another embodiment, more than one of these reactor types may be used in series. In one embodiment, the reactor is a riser reactor. The advantage of a riser reactor is that it allows for very accurate control of the contact time of the feed with the catalyst, as riser reactors exhibit a flow of catalyst and reactants through the reactor that approaches plug flow.

The feedstocks described above are converted primarily into olefins. The olefins produced from the feedstock typically have from 2 to 30 carbon atoms, preferably from 2 to 8 carbon atoms, more preferably from 2 to 6 carbon atoms, most preferably ethylene and/or propylene. In addition to these olefins, diolefins having from 4 to 18 carbon atoms, conjugated or nonconjugated dienes, polyenes, vinyl monomers and cyclic olefins may be produced in the reaction.

In a preferred embodiment, the feedstock, preferably one or more oxygenates, is converted in the presence of a molecular sieve catalyst into olefins having from 2 to 6 carbon atoms. Preferably the oxygenate is methanol, and the olefins are ethylene and/or propylene.

The products from the reactor are typically separated and/or purified to prepare separate product streams in a recovery system. Such systems typically comprise one or more separation, fractionation or distillation towers, columns, and splitters and other associated equipment, for example, various condensers, heat exchangers, refrigeration systems or chill trains, compressors, knock-out drums or pots, pumps and the like.

The recovery system may include a demethanizer, a deethanizer, a depropanizer, a wash tower often referred to as a caustic wash tower and/or quench tower, absorbers, adsorbers, membranes, an ethylene-ethane splitter, a propylene-propane splitter, a butene-butane splitter and the like.

Typically in the recovery system, additional products, by-products and/or contaminants may be formed along with the preferred olefin products. The preferred products, ethylene and propylene are preferably separated and purified for use in derivative processes such as polymerization processes.

In addition to the propylene and ethylene, the products may comprise C4+ olefins, paraffins and aromatics that may be further reacted, recycled or otherwise further treated to increase the yield of the desired products and/or other valuable products. C4+ olefins may be recycled to the oxygenate to olefins conversion reaction or fed to a separate reactor for cracking. The paraffins may also be cracked in a separate reactor, and/or removed from the system to be used elsewhere or possibly as fuel.

Although less desired, the product will typically comprise some aromatic compounds such as benzene, toluene and xylenes. Although it is not the primary aim of the process, xylenes can be seen as a valuable product. Xylenes may be formed in the OTO process by the alkylation of benzene and, in particular, toluene with oxygenates such as methanol. Therefore, in a preferred embodiment, a separate fraction comprising aromatics, in particular benzene, toluene and xylenes is separated from the gaseous product and at least in part recycled to the oxygenate to olefins conversion reactor as part of the oxygenate feed. Preferably, part or all of the xylenes in the fraction comprising aromatics are withdrawn from the process as a product prior to recycling the fraction comprising aromatics to the oxygenate to olefins conversion reactor.

The C4+ olefins and paraffins formed in the oxygenate to olefins conversion reactor may be further reacted in an additional reactor containing the same or a different molecular sieve catalyst. In this additional reactor, the C4+ feed is converted over the molecular sieve catalyst at a temperature in the range of from 500 to 700° C. The additional reactor is also referred to as an OCP reactor and the process that takes place in this reactor is referred to as an olefin cracking process. In contact with the molecular sieve catalyst, at least part of the olefins in the C4+ feed is converted to a product, which includes at least ethylene and/or propylene and preferably both. In addition to ethylene and/or propylene, the gaseous product may comprise higher olefins, i.e. C4+ olefins, and paraffins. The gaseous product is retrieved from the second reactor as part of a second reactor effluent stream.

The olefin feed is contacted with the catalyst at a temperature in the range of from 500 to 700° C., preferably of from 550 to 650° C., more preferably of from 550 to 620° C., even more preferably of from 580 to 610° C.; and a pressure in the range of from 0.1 kPa (1 mbara) to 5 MPa (50 bara), preferably of from 100 kPa (1 bara) to 1.5 MPa (15 bara), more preferably of from 100 kPa (1 bara) to 300 kPa (3 bara). Reference herein to pressures is to absolute pressures.

In one embodiment, the C4+ olefins are separated into at least two fractions: a C4 olefin fraction and a C5+ olefin fraction. In this embodiment, the C4 olefins are recycled to the oxygenate to olefins conversion reactor and the C5+ olefins are fed to the OCP reactor. The cracking behavior of C4 olefins and C5 olefins is believed to be different when contacted with a molecular sieve catalyst, in particular above 500° C.

The cracking of C4 olefins is an indirect process which involves a primary oligomerisation process to a C8, C12 or higher olefin followed by cracking of the oligomers to lower molecular weight hydrocarbons including ethylene and propylene, but also, amongst other things, to C5 to C7 olefins, and by-products such as C2 to C6 paraffins, cyclic hydrocarbons and aromatics. In addition, the cracking of C4 olefins is prone to coke formation, which places a restriction on the obtainable conversion of the C4 olefins. Generally, paraffins, cyclics and aromatics are not formed by cracking. They are formed by hydrogen transfer reactions and cyclisation reactions. This is more likely in larger molecules. Hence the C4 olefin cracking process, which as mentioned above includes intermediate oligomerisation, is more prone to by-product formation than direct cracking of C5 olefins. The conversion of the C4 olefins is typically a function of the temperature and space time (often expressed as the weight hourly space velocity). With increasing temperature and decreasing weight hourly space velocity (WHSV) conversion of the C4 olefins in the feed to the OCP increases. Initially, the ethylene and propylene yields increase, but, at higher conversions, yield decreases at the cost of a higher by-product make and, in particular, a higher coke make, limiting significantly the maximum yield obtainable.

Contrary to C4 olefins, C5 olefin cracking is ideally a relatively straight forward-process whereby the C5 olefin cracks into a C2 and a C3 olefin, in particular above 500° C. This cracking reaction can be run at high conversions, up to 100%, while maintaining, at least compared to C4 olefins, high ethylene and propylene yields with a significantly lower by-product and coke make. Although, C5+ olefins can also oligomerise, this process competes with the more beneficial cracking to ethylene and propylene.

In a preferred embodiment of the process according to the present invention, instead of cracking the C4 olefins in the OCP reactor, the C4 olefins are recycled to the oxygenate to olefins conversion reactor. Again without wishing to be bound by any particular theory, it is believed that in the oxygenate to olefins conversion reactor the C4 olefins are alkylated with, for instance, methanol to C5 and/or C6 olefins. These C5 and/or

C6 olefins may subsequently be converted into at least ethylene and/or propylene. The main by-products from this oxygenate to olefins conversion reaction are again C4 and C5 olefins, which can be recycled to the oxygenate to olefins conversion reactor and olefin cracking reactor, respectively.

Therefore, preferably, where the gaseous products further include C4 olefins, at least part of the C4 olefins are provided to (i) the oxygenate to olefins conversion reactor together with or as part of the oxygenate feed, and/or (ii) the olefin cracking reactor as part of the olefin feed, more preferably at least part of the C4 olefins is provided to the oxygenate to olefins conversion reactor together with or as part of the oxygenate feed. Preferably, where the gaseous products further include C5 olefins, at least part of the C5 olefins are provided to the olefin cracking reactor as part of the olefin feed. Preferably, the olefin feed to the olefin cracking reactor comprises C4+ olefins, preferably C5+ olefins, more preferably C5 olefins.

In a preferred embodiment, the oxygenate to olefins conversion reactor and the optional OCP reactor are operated as riser reactors where the catalyst and feedstock are fed at the base of the riser and an effluent stream with entrained catalyst exits the top of the riser. In this embodiment, gas/solid separators are necessary to separate the entrained catalyst from the reactor effluent. The gas/solid separator may be any separator suitable for separating gases from solids. Preferably, the gas/solid separator comprises one or more centrifugal separation units, preferably cyclone units, optionally combined with a stripper section.

The reactor effluent is preferably cooled in the gas/solid separator to terminate the conversion process and prevent the formation of by-products outside the reactors. The cooling may be achieved by use of a water quench.

Once the catalyst is separated from the effluent, the catalyst may be returned to the reaction zone from which it came, to another reaction zone or to a regeneration zone. Further, the catalyst that has been separated in the gas/solid separator may be combined with catalyst from other gas/solid separators before it is sent to a reaction zone or to the regeneration zone.

During conversion of the oxygenates to olefins, carbonaceous deposits known as “coke” are formed on the surface of and/or within the molecular sieve catalysts. To avoid a significant reduction in activity of the catalyst, the catalyst must be regenerated by burning off the coke deposits.

In one embodiment, a portion of the coked molecular sieve catalyst is withdrawn from the reactor and introduced into a regeneration system. The regeneration system comprises a regenerator where the coked catalyst is contacted with a regeneration medium, preferably an oxygen-containing gas, under regeneration temperature, pressure and residence time conditions.

Examples of suitable regeneration media include oxygen, O₃, SO₃, N₂O, NO, NO₂, N₂O₅, air, air enriched with oxygen, air diluted with nitrogen or carbon dioxide, oxygen and water, carbon monoxide and/or hydrogen. The regeneration conditions are those capable of burning at least a portion of the coke from the coked catalyst, preferably to a coke level of less than 75% of the coke level on the catalyst entering the regenerator. More preferably the coke level is reduced to less than 50% of the coke level on the catalyst entering the regenerator and most preferably the coke level is reduced to less than 30% of the coke level on the catalyst entering the regenerator. Complete removal of the coke is not necessary as this may result in degradation of the catalyst.

The regeneration temperature is in the range of from 200° C. to 1500° C., preferably from 300° C. to 1000° C., more preferably from 450° C. to 700° C. and most preferably from 500° C. to 700° C. In a preferred embodiment, the catalyst is regenerated at a temperature in the range of from 550 to 650° C.

The preferred residence time of the coked molecular sieve catalyst in the regenerator is in the range of from 1 minute to several hours, most preferably 1 minute to 100 minutes. The preferred volume of oxygen in the regeneration medium is from 0.01 mole percent to 10 mole percent based on the total volume of the regeneration medium.

In one embodiment, regeneration promoters, typically metal containing compounds such as platinum and palladium are added to the regenerator directly or indirectly, for example with the coked catalyst composition. In another embodiment, a fresh molecular sieve catalyst is added to the regenerator.

In an embodiment, a portion of the regenerated molecular sieve catalyst from the regenerator is returned to the reactor, directly to the reaction zone or indirectly by pre-contacting with the feedstock.

The burning of coke is an exothermic reaction and in certain embodiments, the temperature in the regeneration system is controlled to prevent it from rising too high.

Various known techniques for cooling the system and/or the regenerated catalyst may be employed including feeding a cooled gas to the regenerator, or passing the regenerated catalyst through a catalyst cooler. A portion of the cooled regenerated catalyst may be returned to the regenerator while another portion is returned to the reactor. In certain embodiments, there is not sufficient coke on the catalyst to raise the temperature of the catalyst to desired levels. In one embodiment, a liquid or gaseous fuel may be fed to the regenerator where it will combust and provide additional heat to the catalyst.

Catalysts suitable for use in the conversion of oxygenates to olefins may be made from practically any small or medium pore molecular sieve. One example of a suitable type of molecular sieve is a zeolite. Suitable zeolites include, but are not limited to AEI, AEL, AFT, AFO, APC, ATN, ATT, ATV, AWW, BIK, CAS, CHA, CHI, DAC, DDR, EDI, ERI, EUO, FER, GOO, HEU, KFI, LEV, LOV, LTA, MFI, MEL, MON, MTT, MTW, PAU, PHI, RHO, ROG, THO, TON and substituted forms of these types. Suitable catalysts include those containing a zeolite of the ZSM group, in particular of the MFI type, such as ZSM-5, the MTT type, such as ZSM-23, the TON type, such as ZSM-22, the MEL type, such as ZSM-11, and the FER type. Other suitable zeolites are for example zeolites of the STF-type, such as SSZ-35, the SFF type, such as SSZ-44 and the EU-2 type, such as ZSM-48. Preferred zeolites for this process include ZSM-5, ZSM-22 and ZSM-23.

A suitable molecular sieve catalyst may have a silica-to-alumina ratio (SAR) of less than 280, preferably less than 200 and more preferably less than 100. The SAR may be in the range of from 10 to 280, preferably from 15 to 200 and more preferably from 20 to 100.

A preferred MR-type zeolite for the oxygenate to olefins conversion catalyst has a silica-to-alumina ratio, SAR, of at least 60, preferably at least 80. More preferred MFI-type zeolite has a silica-to-alumina ratio, SAR, in the range of 60 to 150, preferably in the range of 80 to 100.

The zeolite-comprising catalyst may comprise more than one zeolite. In that case it is preferred that the catalyst comprises at least a more-dimensional zeolite, in particular of the MFI type, more in particular ZSM-5, or of the MEL type, such as zeolite ZSM-11, and a one-dimensional zeolite having 10-membered ring channels, such as of the MTT and/or TON type.

It is preferred that zeolites in the hydrogen form are used in the zeolite-comprising catalyst, e.g., HZSM-5, HZSM-11, and HZSM-22, HZSM-23. Preferably at least 50 wt %, more preferably at least 90 wt %, still more preferably at least 95 wt % and most preferably 100 wt % of the total amount of zeolite used is in the hydrogen form. It is well known in the art how to produce such zeolites in the hydrogen form.

Another example of suitable molecular sieves are siliocoaluminophosphates (SAPOs). SAPOs have a three dimensional microporous crystal framework of PO2+, AlO2-, and SiO2 tetrahedral units. Suitable SAPOs include SAPO-17, -18, 34, -35, -44, but also SAPO-5, -8, -11, -20, -31, -36, 37, -40, -41, -42, -47 and -56; aluminophosphates (AlPO) and metal substituted (silico)aluminophosphates (MeAlPO), wherein the Me in MeAlPO refers to a substituted metal atom, including metal selected from one of Group IA, HA, IB, HIB, IVB, VB, VIB, VIIB, VIIIB and lanthanides of the Periodic Table of Elements. Preferred SAPOs for this process include SAPO-34, SAPO-17 and SAPO-18. Preferred substituent metals for the MeAlPO include Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ga, Ge, Mg, Mn, Ni, Sn, Ti, Zn and Zr.

The molecular sieves described above are formulated into molecular sieve catalyst compositions for use in the oxygenates to olefins conversion reaction and the olefin cracking step. The molecular sieves are formulated into catalysts by combining the molecular sieve with a binder and/or matrix material and/or filler and forming the composition into particles by techniques such as spray-drying, pelletizing, or extrusion. The molecular sieve may be further processed before being combined with the binder and/or matrix. For example, the molecular sieve may be milled and/or calcined.

Suitable binders for use in these molecular sieve catalyst compositions include various types of aluminas, aluminophosphates, silicas and/or other inorganic oxide sol. The binder acts like glue binding the molecular sieves and other materials together, particularly after thermal treatment. Various compounds may be added to stabilize the binder to allow processing.

Matrix materials are usually effective at among other benefits, increasing the density of the catalyst composition and increasing catalyst strength (crush strength and/or attrition resistance). Suitable matrix materials include one or more of the following: rare earth metals, metal oxides including titania, zirconia, magnesia, thoria, beryllia, quartz, silica or sols, and mixtures thereof, for example, silica-magnesia, silica-zirconia, silica-titania, and silica-alumina. In one embodiment, matrix materials are natural clays, for example, kaolin. A preferred matrix material is kaolin.

In one embodiment, the molecular sieve, binder and matrix material are combined in the presence of a liquid to form a molecular sieve catalyst slurry. The amount of binder is in the range of from 2 to 40 wt %, preferably in the range of from 10 to 35 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 15 to 30 wt %, based on the total weight of the molecular sieve, binder and matrix material, excluding liquid (after calcination).

After forming the slurry, the slurry may be mixed, preferably with rigorous mixing to form a substantially homogeneous mixture. Suitable liquids include one or more of water, alcohols, ketones, aldehydes and/or esters. Water is the preferred liquid. In one embodiment, the mixture is colloid-milled for a period of time sufficient to produce the desired texture, particle size or particle size distribution.

The molecular sieve, matrix and optional binder can be in the same or different liquids and are combined in any order together, simultaneously, sequentially or a combination thereof. In a preferred embodiment, water is the only liquid used.

In a preferred embodiment, the slurry is mixed or milled to achieve a uniform slurry of sub-particles that is then fed to a forming unit. A slurry of the zeolite may be prepared and then milled before combining with the binder and/or matrix. In a preferred embodiment, the forming unit is a spray dryer. The forming unit is typically operated at a temperature high enough to remove most of the liquid from the slurry and from the resulting molecular sieve catalyst composition. In a preferred embodiment, the particles are then exposed to ion-exchange using an ammonium nitrate or other appropriate solution.

In one embodiment, the ion exchange is carried out before the phosphorous impregnation. The ammonium nitrate is used to ion exchange the zeolite to remove alkali ions. The zeolite can be impregnated with phosphorous using phosphoric acid followed by a thermal treatment to H+ form. In another embodiment, the ion exchange is carried out after the phosphorous impregnation. In this embodiment, alkali phosphates or phosphoric acid may be used to impregnate the zeolite with phosphorous, and then the ammonium nitrate and heat treatment are used to ion exchange and convert the zeolite to the H+ form.

Alternatively to spray drying the catalyst may be formed into spheres, tablets, rings, extrudates or any other shape known to one of ordinary skill in the art. The catalyst may be extruded into various shapes, including cylinders and trilobes.

The average particle size is in the range of from 1-200 μm, preferably from 50-100 μm. If extrudates are formed, then the average size is in the range of from 1 mm to 10 mm, preferably from 2 mm to 7 mm.

The catalyst may further comprise phosphorus as such or in a compound, i.e. phosphorus other than any phosphorus included in the framework of the molecular sieve.

It is preferred that a MEL or MFI-type zeolite comprising catalyst additionally comprises phosphorus.

The molecular sieve catalyst is prepared by first forming a molecular sieve catalyst precursor as described above, optionally impregnating the catalyst with a phosphorous containing compound and then calcining the catalyst precursor to form the catalyst. The phosphorous impregnation may be carried out by any method known to one of skill in the art.

The phosphorus-containing compound preferably comprises a phosphorus species such as PO₄ ³⁻, P-(OCH₃)₃, or P₂O₅, especially PO₄ ³⁻. Preferably the phosphorus-containing compound comprises a compound selected from the group consisting of ammonium phosphate, ammonium dihydrogen phosphate, dimethylphosphate, metaphosphoric acid and trimethyl phosphite and phosphoric acid, especially phosphoric acid. The phosphorus containing compound is preferably not a Group II metal phosphate. Group II metal species include magnesium, calcium, strontium and barium; especially calcium.

In one embodiment, phosphorus can be deposited on the catalyst by impregnation using acidic solutions containing phosphoric acid (H₃PO₄). The concentration of the solution can be adjusted to impregnate the desired amount of phosphorus on the precursor. The catalyst precursor may then be dried.

The catalyst precursor, containing phosphorous (either in the framework or impregnated) is calcined to form the catalyst. The calcination of the catalyst is important to determining the performance of the catalyst in the oxygenate to olefins process.

The calcination may be carried out in any type of calciner known to one of ordinary skill in the art. The calcination may be carried out in a tray calciner, a rotary calciner, or a batch oven optionally in the presence of an inert gas and/or oxygen and/or steam

The calcination may be carried out at a temperature in the range of from 400° C. to 1000° C., preferably in a range of from 450° C. to 800° C., more preferably in a range of from 500° C. to 700° C. Calcination time is typically dependent on the degree of hardening of the molecular sieve catalyst composition and the temperature and ranges from about 15 minutes to about 2 hours.

The calcination temperatures described above are temperatures that are reached for at least a portion of the calcination time. For example, in a rotary calciner, there may be separate temperature zones that the catalyst passes through. For example, the first zone may be at a temperature in the range of from 100 to 300° C. At least one of the zones is at the temperatures specified above. In a stationary calciner, the temperature is increased from ambient to the calcination temperatures above and so the temperature is not at the calcination temperature for the entire time.

In a preferred embodiment, the calcination is carried out in air at a temperature of from 500° C. to 600° C. The calcination is carried out for a period of time from 30 minutes to 15 hours, preferably from 1 hour to 10 hours, more preferably from 1 hour to 5 hours.

The calcination is carried out on a bed of catalyst. For example, if the calcination is carried out in a tray calciner, then the catalyst precursor added to the tray forms a bed which is typically kept stationary during the calcination. If the calcination is carried out in a rotary calciner, then the catalyst added to the rotary drum forms a bed that although not stationary does maintain some form and shape as it passes through the calciner.

The product recovery system comprises a compressor for compressing and partly condensing the reactor effluent. Knockout or other similar vessels may be situated between stages of the compressor and combined with interstage cooling so that as the material is compressed the heavier components are condensed and can be removed. As the effluent is compressed, some of the components may form contaminants in the compressor. For example, dienes, and other byproducts from the oxygenate to olefins conversion unit may form gum-like or solid materials as a result of the compression and corresponding increase in temperature. In another embodiment, the contaminants may form as a result of polymerization reactions of the components in the effluent stream. According to the process of the invention, a contaminant prevention and/or removal medium is injected into the suction line of the compressor to prevent the formation of these contaminants and/or to remove any that may have formed. The contaminant removal medium may be water. In another embodiment, the contaminant prevention and/or removal medium is a hydrocarbon fraction, preferably a C6+ or C7+ hydrocarbon fraction. The hydrocarbon fraction may also comprise aromatics, and if present, the aromatics are preferably present in the hydrocarbon fraction in an amount of from 25-100 wt %, more preferably in an amount of from 50-100 wt % and most preferably in an amount of from 60-100 wt %.

The injection into the suction line may be carried out intermittently or continuously. Intermittent injection is preferred from a cost perspective, but only if intermittent injection is sufficient to prevent the formation of contaminants and/or to maintain the performance of the compressor.

The injection point in the suction line is located a distance away from the compressor inlet to allow sufficient time for the contaminant prevention and/or removal medium to mix with the gas phase effluent. The injection point is preferably located in the suction line a distance of at least three times the pipe diameter away from the compressor inlet. The distance from the injection point to the compressor inlet is more preferably at least five times the pipe diameter. The injection point is preferably in a vertical section of the suction line below the compressor, and preferably there are no pipe fittings, such as elbows, bends or T-pieces between the injection point and the compressor inlet that could prevent an even distribution of the medium in the effluent.

In some embodiments, any contaminants that form in the compressor can negatively impact the performance of the compressor, by, for example, causing vibration due to the uneven distribution of the contaminant in the compressor. Vibration monitoring equipment may be used to monitor the operation of the compressor. Based on the vibration observed in the compressor, the contaminant removal medium can be injected or the amount of contaminant removal medium can be increased. In one embodiment, the contaminant removal medium may be injected intermittently and it is injected in response to observed vibration. In another embodiment, the efficiency of the compressor is calculated and injection of the contaminant removal medium is started or increased if a drop in efficiency is determined. 

1. A process for preventing contaminants from forming in a compressor in a methanol to olefin separation system comprising: a. compressing an effluent in the compressor, the compressor having an inlet in fluid communication with a suction line, an outlet, and an inner compressor surface; and b. injecting a contaminant prevention medium into the suction line of the compressor wherein contaminants are removed from the compressor with the effluent and optionally separated or otherwise removed from the effluent stream in downstream equipment.
 2. The process of claim 1 wherein the contaminant prevention medium comprises water, a C6+ hydrocarbon fraction, a C7+ hydrocarbon fraction, and/or more than 50 wt % aromatics.
 3. The process of claim 1 wherein the contaminant prevention medium is injected at a point in the suction line sufficiently far from the inlet to provide for good mixing between the effluent and the contaminant prevention medium.
 4. The process of claim 1 wherein the contaminant prevention medium is injected at a point in the suction line at least 3 times the diameter of the suction line away from the inlet.
 5. The process of claim 1 wherein the contaminant prevention medium is injected into the vertical segment of the suction line directly below the compressor.
 6. A process for removing contaminants from a compressor in a methanol to olefin separation system comprising: a. compressing an effluent in the compressor, the compressor having an inlet in fluid communication with a suction line, an outlet, and an inner compressor surface, the compressing occurring under conditions effective to form a contaminant on the inner compressor surface; b. injecting a contaminant removal medium into the suction line of the compressor; c. contacting the contaminant removal medium with the contaminant under conditions effective to remove the contaminant from the inner compressor surface thereby forming a mobile contaminant; and d. removing the mobile contaminant from the compressor.
 7. The process of claim 6 wherein the contaminant causes a vibration in the compressor.
 8. The process of claim 7 further comprising monitoring the vibration.
 9. The process claim 6 further comprising injecting the contaminant removal medium in response to vibration or in response to a drop in compressor efficiency.
 10. The process claim 6 wherein the compressing conditions include an outlet temperature in the range of from 50-90° C.
 11. The process claim 6 wherein the contaminant is formed by polymerization reactions.
 12. The process claim 6 wherein the contaminant removal medium comprises water, a C6+ hydrocarbon fraction, a C7+ hydrocarbon fraction, and/or more than 50 wt % aromatics.
 13. The process claim 6 wherein the contaminant removal medium is injected at a point in the suction line sufficiently far from the inlet to provide for good mixing between the effluent and the contaminant prevention medium.
 14. The process claim 6 wherein the contaminant removal medium is injected at a point in the suction line at least 3 times the diameter of the suction line away from the inlet.
 15. The process claim 6 wherein the contaminant removal medium is injected into the vertical segment of the suction line directly below the compressor. 